Our healthcare system may have been founded to fight infectious disease, but now, as a developed nation that is no longer threatened by flesh-eating bacteria, etc., our healthcare system is rapidly becoming antiquated.
Unlike infectious diseases, chronic diseases can't be "eradicated" in the traditional sense. I feel that chronic illness will always be present in one way or another, even if that "illness" amounts to nothing more than nature taking its course as we enter our 50s and 60s. Many people will make a conscious choice between their health and the other important aspects of life that might compromise that health--such as choosing to get 4 hours of sleep a night for a week straight in order to write grants (I'm looking at you, Greg...). So the notion of eradicating chronic illness altogether is a bit extreme.
What might make more sense for Western medicine in general is to change our system of healthcare delivery to encourage patients (rather than doctors) to take up the burden of care. With so much medical technology and free-flowing information at our disposal, I don't think it's unreasonable to move towards a delivery system in which patients play a much greater role in managing their own health. Medical paternalism is rapidly becoming an antiquity, and if we don't move completely away from it soon, it may very well become a liability.
No comments:
Post a Comment